Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Dx\-qsl\]\s+virus\s+in\s+$1000mp$\s+strange\s+behaviour\s+of\s+FT1000mp\s+on\s+28mhz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Dx\-qsl\]\s+virus\s+in\s+$1000mp$\s+strange\s+behaviour\s+of\s+FT1000mp\s+on\s+28mhz\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re: [Dx-qsl] virus in (1000mp) strange behaviour of FT1000mp on 28mhz (score: 1): Author: smidtca@sprint.ca (Carl Smidt); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:42:23 -0300; I have had 5 of these sent to me today already containing that virus. Why doesn't the moderators/administrators of these reflectors INSIST on updated installed AV software as a prerequisite for subsc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00100.html (8,164 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Re: [Dx-qsl] virus in (1000mp) strange behaviour of FT1000mp on 28mhz (score: 1): Author: smidtca@sprint.ca (Carl Smidt); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:56:08 -0300; Listen my friend. I have NOT been infected, my Norton AV program catches them all, so why all the harangue. My problem is with all these irresponsible computer owners that are too CHEAP to buy a good; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00104.html (13,054 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Re: [Dx-qsl] virus in (1000mp) strange behaviour of FT1000mp on 28mhz (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:11:10 -0000; I REPEAT!! BOTH KLEZ AND THE NEW BUG&*(^% VIRUS FAKE THE "FROM" ADDRESS TO BE A RANDOM ADDRESS FOUND ON THE INFECTED MACHINE! ANYONE'S ADDRESS CAN SHOW UP THERE AND IT MOST LIKELY IS NOT THE PERSON W; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00105.html (15,808 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]