- 1. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
- Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 21:14:47 EDT
- Director - Driven = 89.5 " Driven - Reflector = 102.5" I think the SteppIR is a BIG step in the right direction. As far as tuning goes, it is a no commpromise design. You can have a resonant antenna
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00503.html (8,260 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 21:01:45 -0600
- Your statement that the SteppIR antenna is a "no compromise" antenna ignores the fact that the ELECTRICAL spacing is DIFFERENT for EACH BAND. How can that be OPTIMUM? THAT is the compromise in the St
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00507.html (10,027 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
- Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:53:18 +0100
- YO and it appears that for a 16' boom and the DE somewhere in the middle, 16 or 17 DB F/B is about all you can achieve on 10 meters. Still, it's decent F/B for most applications. Question for a Stepp
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00519.html (7,736 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
- Author: bnowak@telocity.com (Brad Nowak)
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:56:56 -0400
- Let's not forget that the SteppIR IS only a 3 element antenna. Fact is, ALL 3 el., multi-band, YAGI antennas must be a compromise. http://www.mscomputer.com additional 5 percent off
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00520.html (11,481 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:48:41 -0600
- Actually, EVERY Yagi is a compromise, trading off between Gain, F/B, SWR, Bandwidth, Size, Weight, Cost, etc. Generally speaking, Maximum Gain, Maximum F/B, and best 50 Ohm match (for a split dipole
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00533.html (7,938 bytes)
- 6. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
- Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin)
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:13:19 -0400
- simplicity of matching. They also optimize balance and torque... and, of course, there is cost, and deed restrictions! We'd all be running large stacks otherwise. There is no "ultimate" antenna... j
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00546.html (7,224 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu