- 1. [Towertalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: wa3gin@erols.com (David Jordan)
- Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 18:05:14 -0500
- Hi Folks, This weekend I took two old Butternut HF6V vertical antenna and mounted them end to end to create a rotating dipole. I had been using them as a phased array at a past QTH and they were just
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00023.html (6,695 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 23:28:11 -0500
- Regular dipoles vary hugely depending on height. Shortening one with loading will lower the impedance. How high was it? 73 mounted as a at 40m thought
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00026.html (7,932 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: "Dick" <dmcnutt@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:49:04 -0500
- I am in the process of putting up a full size rotating dipole for 40 meters.. I plan to later shorten it to a loaded 40 foot dipole...the ultimate goal is to contruct a 2 element beam on 40...I need
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00144.html (6,797 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: ABowenN4OO <abowen@nettally.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:26:52 -0500
- At 08:49 AM 1/6/2005 -0500, you wrote: I am in the process of putting up a full size rotating dipole for 40 meters.. I plan to later shorten it to a loaded 40 foot dipole...the ultimate goal is to co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00146.html (8,983 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:06:44 -0500
- Dick How about using some solid fiberglass rod for the coil forms? You should be able to find it in diameters from 1/2" up to almost 2" if you search hard and long. I'd use center-loading as opposed
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00151.html (8,950 bytes)
- 6. RE: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: "daniel hearn" <dhearn@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:21:39 -0800
- Check this out for a skillfully designed shortened element beam for 40/80. http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz/intro.htmoriginal I am in the process of putting up a full size rotating dipole for 40 meters.. I p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00153.html (8,959 bytes)
- 7. RE: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: "daniel hearn" <dhearn@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:17:43 -0800
- TTers, the URL below worked this morning. I had it stored in my Bookmarks and tested it before posting. I have no idea why qsl.net will not work at this moment. Maybe they are doing maintenance or so
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00167.html (10,351 bytes)
- 8. RE: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:49:10 -0500
- Get rig of the 'original' at the end ... use http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz/intro.htm 73, ... Joe, K4IK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting T
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00168.html (11,922 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:19:58 -0500
- It works fine IF you get rid of the 'original' at the end! Don N8DE daniel hearn wrote: TTers, the URL below worked this morning. I had it stored in my Bookmarks and tested it before posting. I have
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00169.html (11,246 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:19:46 -0800
- Don't use: http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz/intro.htmoriginal Instead go to: http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz It is working now. daniel hearn wrote: TTers, the URL below worked this morning. I had it stored in my Bo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00172.html (10,178 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu