Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+S\s+units\s+have\s+been\s+6\s+db\s+for\s+a\s+long\s+time\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] S units have been 6 db for a long time (score: 1)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 03:07:17 -0400
Have a look at the meter (carrier level indicator) on this photo of an excellent condition pre-WW2 RME 69. http://www.nucleus.com/~jordana/rme69dials.jpg Calibration is 0-72 db in six db steps, with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00117.html (8,239 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] S units have been 6 db for a long time (score: 1)
Author: Mark <AA6DX@arrl.net> (Mark)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 05:45:31 -0700
Well .. seems like the picture shows 48 dB makes S-9, or 5 1/3 dB per S Unit..... which as I seem to remember back when learning this stuff, that 5 point something dB was accepted as the S Unit, even
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00121.html (10,187 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] S units have been 6 db for a long time (score: 1)
Author: k5gh@attbi.com (George Huling)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 07:48:55 -0500
What does this have to do with towers??? QSY George
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00125.html (6,859 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] S units have been 6 db for a long time (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 06:45:04 -0400
Most manufacturers "tried" to use ~5dB as an S-unit, not six. Six dB was NEVER an industry standard, as a matter of fact there never was any industry standard by any sense of the true meaning of "st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00178.html (7,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu