Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Shunt\-Fed\s+Tower\s+EZNEC\s+Simulation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Shunt\-Fed\s+Tower\s+EZNEC\s+Simulation\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Shunt-Fed Tower EZNEC Simulation (score: 1): Author: jsbmjb@theriver.com (John Bodey); Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 20:58:25 -0700; What don't I understand??? EZNEC tells me that my 78' Rohn 45 with a small Warc-band beam is resonant at 3.0 MHz. Moving the shunt feed connection higher or lower, closer or farther from the tower on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00113.html (7,037 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Shunt-Fed Tower EZNEC Simulation (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 15:01:57 -0400; The tower resonance is the tower resonance, period. Nothing changes that. That is a frequency at which RF current flows most easily in the tower/antenna combo. Everything else is forcing energy into; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00135.html (9,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]