Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Space\s+Saver\s+Dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Space\s+Saver\s+Dipoles\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: N5BSD@arrl.net (John von Gonten); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:23:04 -0600; Well since I sent it to the wrong address the first trip let us hope I got it right this round. Has anyone dealt with or know what kind of performance Can be had from W9INN's shortened dipoles?? I am; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00783.html (9,269 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: faunt@panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:50:10 -0500 (EST); Has anyone dealt with or know what kind of performance Can be had from W9INN's shortened dipoles?? I am looking for a way to get something in the air To use for 160M shows to have a 71' space-saver a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00784.html (8,752 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 11:00:54 -0800; I have a W9INN 130' (or so) loaded dipole. Not bad. 2:1 VSWR bandwidth appears to be about 25 kHz, but even a full-sized job is only about 50 kHz. I'm using coax to feed it, but if I was serious, I'd; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00785.html (9,922 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 15:30:31 -0500; The best way to answer your question is by modeling via NEC-4, or at least NEC-2. The radiation resistance of an antenna that short is very very low, so you must to work really hard to reduce the los; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00786.html (9,021 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: RedHaines@centurytel.net (Red); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:49:50 -0600; Shortened antennas generally are most effective if the loads or matching networks used to match the shortened elements are designed and employed to minimize IR losses. A good approach to shortening a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00787.html (12,000 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:10:22 -0600; Do you have a tower and beam? If so, how high? Are the guys insulated? If so, shunt feeding the tower for 160M is probably the BEST solution, especially for DX. If you cannot run full size 1/4 WL rad; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00791.html (7,001 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Space Saver Dipoles (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:56:12 -0600; Do you have a tower and beam? If so, how high? Are the guys insulated? If so, shunt feeding the tower for 160M is probably the BEST solution, especially for DX. If you cannot run full size 1/4 WL rad; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00792.html (7,026 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]