- 1. [Towertalk] Swinging Gates (score: 1)
- Author: Chuck@dxham.net (Chuck Sudds)
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 17:01:00 -0500
- Greetings TowerTalkians! After considering the pros and cons and expenses involved with the "Christmas Tree" stack that I was thinking about doing a few days ago, I think that I have decided on simpl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00586.html (7,519 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Swinging Gates (score: 1)
- Author: kb7ww@easystreet.com (Arthur Moe)
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 22:55:11 +0000
- Chuck, I have seen limit switches added to the interfering tower legs and small plates to trip the limit switch added to the boom of antennas used on the Swinging Gate. Allen Bradley and others makes
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00588.html (8,439 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Swinging Gates (score: 1)
- Author: w9re@worldnet.att.net (Mike Wetzel)
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 21:32:55 -0500
- Chuck, That's the beauty of using T2X rotators on swing arms-you can't hurt anything by turning them into a tower leg (not enough torque)! Now it's a different story if you are using a prop pitch. Al
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00595.html (9,090 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] Swinging Gates (score: 1)
- Author: Chuck@dxham.net (Chuck Sudds)
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:16:08 -0500
- Thanks again everyone, for all of your fantastic advice concerning the swinging gates and the rotation of such. The concensus is that I needent worry about any limit switches, which is good news. I r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00612.html (7,711 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] Swinging Gates (score: 1)
- Author: ve6jy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca (ve6jy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca)
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:00:44 -0600 (MDT)
- While the limit switches aren't needed to prevent damage to the tower, if you happen to wedge the brake while you are tight up against a leg, you may not be able to "rock" it enough to get it unstuck
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00614.html (9,510 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu