Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Tower\s+Comparisons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Tower\s+Comparisons\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Tower Comparisons (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:10:43 -0500; Ford's question on rating 25G: PSF Mike responded. ** I've received a number of excellent treatises on the subject. Mike's response points out several important issues--all of which are omitted in th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00629.html (8,089 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Tower Comparisons (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:28:11 EDT; Actually the brochure/specs haven't been updated but the towers are all rated for 60 MPH (which ain't much use since the lowest rating in the country is 70 MPH). Blueprints aren't very useful. You ne; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00645.html (7,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]