- 1. [Towertalk] Tribander anomaly (score: 1)
- Author: w4zw@comcast.net (W4ZW)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:01:24 -0400
- I have an antenna/tower question for a change of pace. I discovered quite by accident that 15M signals are better on my 402CD CC 40M beam than on either of the A4S tribanders I currently have up. I w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00198.html (9,755 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Tribander anomaly (score: 1)
- Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR))
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 16:49:38 -0400
- Before you blame or compliment an antenna, determine the complete loss/gain including feedline losses. Be sure you're not overlooking something in the system. Are all three antennas pointing in the p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00204.html (12,082 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Tribander anomaly (score: 1)
- Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:52:20 -0400
- can you easily swap feedlines - can you take an out[put rating of exactly 100 W at the stn and then see if the saem number of resulting watts exist at the end of both of the coaxes? I woulod suspect
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00208.html (11,537 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] Tribander anomaly (score: 1)
- Author: Mark <AA6DX@arrl.net> (Mark)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 20:08:14 -0700
- My humble suggestion .. if it is relatively convenient to do so, -- well heck even if it ain't ..spin the lower aerial 90 degrees, which will change -- not necessarily fix-- the mutual admiration soc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00217.html (12,193 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] Tribander anomaly (score: 1)
- Author: w4zw@comcast.net (W4ZW)
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 17:10:31 -0400
- Thanks for the comments, Bill, (N3RR) *Be sure you're not overlooking something in the system. *Are all three antennas pointing in the proper direction? Yes. *Is there additional feed line loss in th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00308.html (9,913 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu