- 1. [Towertalk] Trylon on 160M - Redux (score: 1)
- Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 23:07:06 -0500
- TT: Last time I reported on my small success in loading my Trylon 64-foot tower on 160M. At that time I said I thought the three parallel shunt wires were tapped too high up on the tower (they were a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00089.html (8,133 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] Trylon on 160M - Redux (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:11:21 -0600
- On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 23:07:06 -0500 "EUGENE SMAR" The RESONANT FREQUENCY of the ANTENNA is determined by the size and shape of the STRUCTURE. The TAP POINT has some complex IMPEDANCE with a REAL and RE
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00095.html (7,334 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] Trylon on 160M - Redux (score: 1)
- Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:07:48 -0500
- Tom: Thanks for the clarification. I was thrilled that I had been able to move the minimum SWR point into the sweet spot on 160M. I, therefore, concluded I could do this for almost anywhere in the ba
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00101.html (9,410 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu