Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+WX0B\s+Six\-Pack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+WX0B\s+Six\-Pack\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: bob@cytanet.com.cy (Bob Henderson); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 06:17:13 -0000; I am wondering if any Six-Pack users out there are experiencing the same problem I am. I have found my Six Pack to be rather unreliable. The problem is that the relays don't always operate in such a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00258.html (9,326 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 06:35:16 -0400; been there done that! Same exact problem completely resolved and since unit has worked flawlessly...had same conversation with Jay a year ago! I solved the problem by doing the following... I noted t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00259.html (11,858 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:16:54 -0400; If it looks like a duck... Certainly sounds like a product defect to me. Defective relays and/or insufficient pull-in voltage. GL/73 Gary W2CS; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00260.html (11,153 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: Sherman@mscomputer.com (Sherman Leifer); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:44:15 -0400; I have just installed this switch box 300 feet from the shack and it works perfectly. Running a little higher voltage is always a good idea to ensure proper closure. The cable one uses would also be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00261.html (13,274 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: bob@cytanet.com.cy (Bob Henderson); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:00:35 -0000; Good thought Kevin but not the problem here. My supply leads are of 5 Amp twin cable only 3 feet long. I measured the voltage across an activated relay coil and it was 14V but still operation was unr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00263.html (11,874 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: K6LL@adelphia.net (Dave Hachadorian); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:28:55 -0000; are experiencing the same unreliable. The problem is that the reliable contact is made. I've been using the six-Pack for over a year now, with not one instance of that problem. I'm using 13.8 VDC. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00264.html (8,245 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:10:44 -0400; 1) The design is not bad. Too many of them out there working FB for that. 2) You say relays, assuming you really mean more than one exhibits the problem. It is unlikely that six relays are all bad wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00286.html (11,956 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: bob@cytanet.com.cy (Bob Henderson); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 08:12:36 -0000; I am a little overwhelmed at the number of replies my enquiry has generated. At least as many direct to me as through the reflector. Thanks everyone, your comments are much appreciated though too num; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00290.html (17,337 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:39:25 EDT; wiping I saw somewhere (G3? or Rich Measures page?) circuit for power supply arrangement, where the relays get higher voltage "shock" when first turned on, then voltage drops to nominal for holding t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00293.html (8,524 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:54:14 -0400; Do the relays contain any vendor/model information? Based on the desription of the problem, it does seem likely that the wrong coil voltage is used in that particular unit, particularly when it is no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00294.html (8,070 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca (Mike & Coreen Smith); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:35:50 -0300; What about RF getting into a relay maybe ? -- Original Message -- From: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@contesting.com> To: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00306.html (13,618 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:17:04 -0000; It appears that the relays used in the six-pack do not tolerate much lower than 12v. I had intermittent problems with mine, although my situation was much worse than yours. I used a Top Ten Band deco; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00309.html (10,663 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca (Mike & Coreen Smith); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 21:32:45 -0300; Ok, not RF problem ,then. Was just a thought. I still really like the "hammer solution"/ (my favorite!) - Mike 'AA -- Original Message -- From: "Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com> To: "Mike & Coreen S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00311.html (16,833 bytes)
14. [Towertalk] WX0B Six-Pack (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:16:40 -0400; don't think so... on my situation problem was apparent by the lack of "closure" [NO THUNK] with xcvr in receive or completely turned off...am wondering if it might be some sort of wave soldering prob; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00312.html (15,453 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]