Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Why\s+capacity\s+hats\s+on\s+40\-2CD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Why\s+capacity\s+hats\s+on\s+40\-2CD\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 07:26:12 -0400; The subject line almost says it all. This question originated because a friend and I were speculating about replacing the linear loading on a Force 12 EF-240S with lumped inductance, placed at the sa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00484.html (7,211 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 16:32:40 -0400; AO tells me that the capacity hats on the D-40 (or 40-2CD) shorten the element tips by about 26 inches. Ran my D-40 (40-2CD) driven element model with and without the capacity rods ... and the tip ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00500.html (8,839 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 20:40:12 -0400; When properly placed, capacitance hats improve bandwidth and efficiency. You can load the element with more inductance and no capacitance hat, but both bandwidth and efficiency will be reduced.73, T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00506.html (7,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]