Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+coax\s+on\s+new\s+tower\s+\(\s+high\s+desert\s+\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: xppq@pyramid.net (xppq)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 05:49:22 -0700
What about use of RG8/U FOAM coax in outdoor environment. Again sealing all connections well - there is no air dielectric here? lots of UV sun here=20 josh n7xm -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00168.html (7,483 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 09:00:19 -0500
RG8 is fine. It's the good ol standby. However, there are many newer cables that have far better performance. Of course, RG8 is very cheap. It's 20 cents a foot cheaper than some of the other stuff.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00171.html (8,184 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com (Blake Meinecke)
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:43:34 -0400
and Great stuff. Just remember not to step on or kink it. Dielectric is fragile. blake n4gi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00180.html (7,653 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:53:21 -0700
The problem with RG8 "foam" cables is the same problem that all "soft" cables have, that being it's mechanically fragile. If handled with care, it should last a long time. But it should not be clampe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00212.html (10,294 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:09:16 -0500
I've not seen this problem ever. I've tie wrapped or taped all my cables over the years and have never seen an issue. It's hard for me to believe a little tie wrap could hurt a dielectric. Even if yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00237.html (9,105 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:09:13 -0700
Hi Jon, I disagree with you entirely. The "failure" has nothing to do with frequency, or an impedance bump. The failure is dielectric breakdown that occurs with high power operation and a pinched die
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00240.html (11,304 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:04:26 -0500
I understand that. I've never seen it happen with any of the setups that I have done. Maybe I'm just careful about my cable runs. 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Life Member: ARRL, NRA Mem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00242.html (8,122 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] coax on new tower ( high desert ) (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:57:30 -0700
No sweat, Jon. You have been careful, or maybe lucky, or maybe a bit of both! If you read "Belden Innovations," for many years running they warned about using nylon tie-wraps with coaxial cable, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00243.html (9,311 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu