Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+deed\s+restrictions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+deed\s+restrictions\s*$/: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

41. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: Earl" <ebailley@direcpc.com (Earl); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:15:35 -0800; Nazis. Implies bad guys. I am certain there were a couple of good Nazis in 1934. Equally there must be some good guys running the CC &R operations today. The comment is really to direction rather tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00360.html (12,276 bytes)
42. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@firstinter.net (Stu Greene); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:28:23 -0700; I have three Purple Hearts backing this statement: there have never been good Nazis from 1922 to the present; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00361.html (8,938 bytes)
43. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: W2CS@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 16:33:36 -0500; Perhaps you would agree to a slight wording change, reminiscent of language used in WW2: The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. :-) Gary W2CS; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00362.html (9,719 bytes)
44. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@firstinter.net (Stu Greene); Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:43:39 -0700; Roger; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00363.html (8,890 bytes)
45. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE); Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 23:59:30 -0800; No, just trying to state that things are different. From a FAQ report at RAC. I will conclude by pointing out that we are in a much better position in Canada than our fellow amateurs in the United St; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00374.html (9,875 bytes)
46. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: gclute@attbi.com (Geo Clute W7LFD); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:15:18 -0800; Joe, I believe you've missed the point. CC&R's being a contractual arrangement between buyer/seller is enforced by the tort laws of the U.S. Now those tort laws make no distinctions between the Bill; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00399.html (11,482 bytes)
47. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@firstinter.net (Stu Greene); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:35:18 -0700; This is why this discussion should appear on the Ham Law Reflector. CC&Rs are interpreted and adjudicated under basic contract and real property law. Torts are civil wrongs, such as libel and slander; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00400.html (9,299 bytes)
48. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@hotmail.com (Eddy Avila); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:28:10 +0000; Stu, while I completely agree with your points about CC&R's being a contract between private parties, I must add that this discussion belongs on all reflectors, in my opinion, regardless of the Refle; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00406.html (10,298 bytes)
49. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: cdietz@swbell.net (Logan Dietz); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:51:32 -0600; contract I totally disagree... This is off subject. Also, most of the opinions are legally incorrect and could be dangerous to the pocketbook if followed! Chuck, W5PR; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00408.html (9,251 bytes)
50. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@firstinter.net (Stu Greene); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:56:00 -0700; You are very right, Chuck; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00413.html (9,031 bytes)
51. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@hotmail.com (Eddy Avila); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 23:43:14 +0000; Stu and Chuck, I find it interesting you guys believe this is off the Tower reflector subject when in fact these covenants aim to eliminate just that, towers and antennas attached to towers....so, te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00415.html (9,821 bytes)
52. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:06:30 -0800; Torts are good. The law is that you can only have one tort before supper. (mama's law.) Sorry, :+}) Chris opr VE7HCB; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00416.html (9,932 bytes)
53. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: Bill Otten" <res0958z@verizon.net (Bill Otten); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:26:51 -0500; I agree....let me see here: Towertalk.......tower restrictions due to CC&R's....sure seems logical to me. I'd imagine this is a topic that MOST readers here could possibly have to confront if things; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00417.html (10,256 bytes)
54. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:48:07 -0800 (PST); I agree with Eddy. There's nothing that will bring down more towers than CC&Rs. And it is not all a legal issue. Part of it is practical advice and awareness raising. Once you are in the thick of a f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00436.html (10,914 bytes)
55. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:49:01 -0800 (PST); Or two if they are veggie torts, right? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00437.html (10,607 bytes)
56. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: gclute@attbi.com (Geo Clute W7LFD); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:52:22 -0800; A couple of the guys have corrected my statement about tort damages...and I should have explained further by explaining that a neighbor persistently pestered the city attorney until the city attorney; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00438.html (10,702 bytes)
57. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: cdietz@swbell.net (Logan Dietz); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:58:56 -0600; Yes, however, there is a listserve that is specifically for restrictions.... That way those of us who specifically purchased a house without restrictions would not have to wade through the restrictio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00440.html (9,473 bytes)
58. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: sales@webzbydesign.com (Kevin Adam Webz By Design); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 04:00:12 -0500; Here in Fort Wayne Indiana we have what is called neighborhood code in force ment now they take to attack my towers here on my property they say I have to remove my towers so I have got name ga stopp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00446.html (12,313 bytes)
59. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:00:17 -0500; The best thing to do is to vote with your wallet. Don't buy in areas that have CC&Rs. Just say no! Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00447.html (8,136 bytes)
60. [TowerTalk] Deed Restrictions (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC); Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 10:12:39 EST; I found this little piece in this morning's Federal Register. FCC Abolishes Deed Restrictions Washington DC, April 1, 1998 - In a landmark decision, the Federal Communications Commission voted this m; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00008.html (7,594 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]