- 1. [Towertalk] director rotation (score: 1)
- Author: k1my@msn.com (Bruce Makas)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 08:44:23 -0700
- I have a KLM KT34XA. If the reflector were to rotate a lot on the boom, say 30-45 degrees from horizontal, would that have any significant effect on antenna performance? Has not happened but I was wo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00303.html (6,803 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] director rotation (score: 1)
- Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 22:44:53 -0700
- Coupling with respect angle is generally a function of square of the cosine of the angle between the two elements. Thus at 5 degrees offset, the coupling loss relative to perfect alignment would be a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00320.html (7,839 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] director rotation (score: 1)
- Author: Mark <AA6DX@arrl.net> (Mark)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 23:18:23 -0700
- Interesting discussion ... I have had aerials "malfunction" during winter storms ... read, during contests .. and still work, but had no time to analyze whether it was for the better or worse... "kee
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00321.html (9,298 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] director rotation (score: 1)
- Author: Chuck@dxham.net (Chuck Sudds)
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 10:42:35 -0500
- The old Telrex antenna company in Asbury Park, NJ, used to sell what they called a "Spiralray" 11 element 6 meter beam. I had the 27ft boom model and the 36ft boom model and both worked fantastic! Th
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00327.html (8,493 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] director rotation (score: 1)
- Author: Mark <AA6DX@arrl.net> (Mark)
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 09:48:32 -0700
- Ahhh ...that brings back another memory ... one of those spiral aerials ... the Gonset, I believe ... had dual mounting holes in the boom for the elements, so you could configure it either as a twist
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00328.html (9,270 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu