Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+structural\s+assumptions\/\/\s+rope\-\-bolts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+structural\s+assumptions\/\/\s+rope\-\-bolts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] structural assumptions// rope--bolts (score: 1): Author: jljarvis@adelphia.net (jljarvis); Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:03:03 -0400; It's interesting to observe the assumptions we make about mechanical gear. to wit: * 1/8" stainless aircraft cable breaking strength is similar to that of 1/2" braided dacron. It's also a lot harder; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00156.html (8,041 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] structural assumptions// rope--bolts (score: 1): Author: jimlux@earthlink.net (Jim Lux); Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:46:44 -0700; Higher strength bolts can also be stiffer, and can actually take more of the load as a result. I would imagine that the average tower isn't a "ragged edge of material science" design, but, the desig; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00157.html (8,486 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] structural assumptions// rope--bolts (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:08:51 -0400; I've had original equipment Rohn bolts rust. I also doubt you'll find any reasonable quality hardened or stainless bolts weaker than the Rohn bolts. Not that it matters, because even the Rohn bolt i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00161.html (9,749 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] structural assumptions// rope--bolts (score: 1): Author: sk-8-er@clnk.com (Zac Smith); Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:28:37 -0500; if your gonna use it for ANY tower structure application go with A325 galvanized bolts, you can buy em from sabre comm, tell me what size you need and ill send ya the part # and their fone #, rhon ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00179.html (11,127 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]