- 1. [Towertalk] tower falling faillures (score: 1)
- Author: alwilliams@olywa.net (Al Williams)
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 08:41:22 -0800
- 1. I am a subscriber to ham-law@altlaw.com and occasionally receiving postings. To my knowledge there is no archives for that reflector. I would appreciate information if this is not so. 2. I have a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00180.html (7,257 bytes)
- 2. [Towertalk] tower falling faillures (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:26:53 EST
- First the Society of Broadcast Engineers ain't interested in crank-ups; and free-standing towers are height-limited so they're way in the minority when it comes to tower structures. Second, is there
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00183.html (7,478 bytes)
- 3. [Towertalk] tower falling faillures (score: 1)
- Author: wa2bpe@exotrope.net (WA2BPE)
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:56:03 -0500
- Steve and all, This may have been discussed for the past six years,but most of us haven't probably followed this particular topic - unless it directly affected us (plus not being subscribed for all t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00188.html (9,422 bytes)
- 4. [Towertalk] tower falling faillures (score: 1)
- Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:23:32 -0500
- On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 08:41:22 -0800 "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net> writes: See also page B.4 ff, SETBACK Fred Hopengarten K1VR hopengarten@post.harvard.edu Six Willarch Road * Lincoln, MA 01773-5
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00200.html (7,348 bytes)
- 5. [Towertalk] tower falling faillures (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 13:27:42 EST
- plans" adopted The best place for this kind of advice is the ham-law reflector - that's where the legal types hang out and they've been thru this before. purport to give legal advice. Submissions: ha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00210.html (8,587 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu