Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Partial\s+loss\s+of\s+frequency\s+data\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hoaglin" <Dave_Hoaglin@abtassoc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:35:40 -0500
Toward the end of my operating in ARRL DX SSB, I noticed that the program was no longer displaying the current frequency on the screen. By habit I change bands on the radio (a TS-850), and the progra
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00005.html (7,141 bytes)

2. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Wetzel" <mjwetzel@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:29:16 -0500
Dave, I think I went back a version because of some frequency logging problems and in the one back version every once in a while I noticed a loss of frequency info and I rebooted. Maybe during the DX
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00006.html (8,246 bytes)

3. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:13:57 -0800
Do you have: FILTER RADIO MESSAGE LENGTH = TRUE in you configuration? Whenever I get wierd radio control behavior, I usually find I've forgotten that setting (which really should be TRUE by default,
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00007.html (8,284 bytes)

4. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: Ron Rossi <kk1l@intergate.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:50:26 -0500
Regarding the entry not showing up in the bandmap...I would guess that you do not have display dupes enabled. Are you sure it does not show up with a spacebar entry? I am using a rather back level ve
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00008.html (8,547 bytes)

5. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:32:21 +0000
With 6.79 & TS-950S here, the program will stop showing the frequency display for the radio while I tune the radio. A little while after I stop tuning the radio, the program then displays the frequen
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00009.html (8,029 bytes)

6. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:16:52 -0800
The problem here is that the Kenwood radios can't chew gum (report their frequency over the serial port) and walk (QSY up/down the band with the VFO knob) at the same time. As you increase the timeou
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00010.html (8,880 bytes)

7. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:32:53 +0000
N6TR lamented: Roger. Grrrrr. It's been so long since I used this 950, I seem to have forgotten it will have behaved this way all along - as well as others having to put up with, though maybe it's mo
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00011.html (9,626 bytes)

8. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:42:50 -0800
The radio does not respond to the requests for frequency information when the VFO knob is being turned. It saves them all up until the knob stops turning, then all of them get responded to. So - TR
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00012.html (8,383 bytes)

9. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:49:23 -0500
This never seemed like an issue with my 950SDX. I just measured the delay between the time I stopped turning the dial, and TR updating the frequency. With 6.69 (my version-of-choice), it's never mor
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00013.html (8,216 bytes)

10. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:01:38 +0000
N6TR added: If I increase KENWOOD RESPONSE TIME, things seem to get better, but there is still variability in the amount of time that the program recovers from a period of tuning the rig, with that a
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00014.html (9,934 bytes)

11. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 02:08:32 +0000
In talking directly with N2IC: 73, VR2BrettGraham _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00015.html (8,955 bytes)

12. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: JI1RXQ <hiro.ueno@nifty.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:29:01 +0900
I usually use a TS850, but have a TS690. I have tried the TS690. With TR6.79 and KENWOOD RESPONSE TIME 100, TS690 works as follows. TS850 seems to work like the TS950. When tuning, compared to TS690,
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00020.html (8,383 bytes)

13. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:24:26 +0000
JI1RXQ added: I have now tried an earlier version of TR & based on the various reports made here, it does appear as if older Kenwoods behave better if not polled unnecessarily. It would probably be h
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00026.html (9,004 bytes)

14. Re: [Trlog] Partial loss of frequency data (score: 1)
Author: Ron Rossi <kk1l@intergate.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:42:07 -0500
The "old" Kenwoods are actually quite happy being polled frequently as long as you look for a response before you poll again. The 6.73 and 6.74 versions would poll at a default rate of 100ms and cons
/archives//html/TRLog/2005-03/msg00028.html (10,890 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu