Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+SS\s+CW\s+observations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+SS\s+CW\s+observations\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:07:35 -0800; I noticed two things during the SS CW. 1. Sunrise/sunset and beam headings are messed up. This is probably a bug I introduced when supporting the = sign for the cty.dat file. 2. I had my computer han; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00005.html (7,387 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:23:15 +0000; Hi Tree: I used 6.90 for CW SS. I don't use Shift Key RIT. I ended up using two K3's and had USE IRQ's off. The program didn't crash all weekend. I noted the bad beam headings - not a big deal in SS.; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00006.html (8,961 bytes)
3. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:31:46 -0800; Thanks for the info. This is "normal" behavior. The dupe check routine isn't capable of noticing that the CW sending has caught up to your input and kicking off the rest of the exchange. I have just; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00007.html (8,327 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:41:29 -0800; I also used 6.90 in SS (the second version ... After SS I noticed a later time stamp so there is at least a third version ;>). The only new issue I noticed was that the CW speed was slower in auto-CQ; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00008.html (7,281 bytes)
5. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: John Unger <w4au@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:51:18 -0500; ... stuff deleted ... Yes, yes, rid Trlog and the world of packet spot support! But, don't forget to incorporate skimmer into the program (BIG, BIG grin here...). My favorite panic problem comes from; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00009.html (7,715 bytes)
6. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: "Robert Brandon" <rb@austin.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:02:29 -0600; Top Ten band decoder support got broken somewhere after 6.79, so I'm still on 6.79. Is that now fixed? I love the shift key RIT but the double-shift-clear function doesn't work quite right, at least; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00010.html (8,518 bytes)
7. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: "Mike Wetzel" <mjwetzel@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:37:51 -0500; I used the newest version this past weekend and had no crashes or issues. On the dupe checking, I also found using the 'alt-d' would halt the program so I trained myself to not use it during the exch; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00011.html (9,591 bytes)
8. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:02:51 -0800; It will "halt" the program if you use it while the auto start send feature is active. Once it starts sending the CQ EXCHANGE, you should be able to use it fine. Tree _________________________________; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00012.html (8,188 bytes)
9. Re: [Trlog] SS CW observations (score: 1): Author: rt_clay@bellsouth.net; Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:31 +0000; I also used the newest version, no problems here at all. I use alt-d a lot, but I guess I was lucky because I never had auto-repeat turned on. I did have to dig out an older computer, running FreeDOS; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-11/msg00013.html (8,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]