Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Version\s+6\.88\s+Slowdown\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Version\s+6\.88\s+Slowdown\s+Question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Kirley <pkirley@fuse.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:48:04 -0400; For some years I stayed with version 6.79, because I had no radios that could interface with TRLog and the changes after 6.79 all seemed to deal with the radio interface. But recently I have upgraded; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00004.html (8,340 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:59:12 -0700; Can you verify that these slow downs do not occur if there is not radio interfaced? Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00005.html (7,363 bytes)
3. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Kirley <pkirley@fuse.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:54:21 -0400; The problem was noticed on the air, both with a radio interfaced and with no radio interfaced. The experiments were conducted off the air without a radio. The experiments should be easy to replicate.; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00006.html (8,587 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Kirley <pkirley@fuse.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:54:56 -0400; If you're referring to the memory available listed in the upper-right of the TR Log screen, it's in the low six digits. 73, Paul W8TM _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing lis; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00007.html (7,304 bytes)
5. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: "KL7RA" <kl7ra@ptialaska.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:21:14 -0800; Yo Paul Did you go back and make sure the old TR version is still okay. Might be something easy like smartdrv is off? Also you might download another copy of the new TR version in case the first was; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00008.html (7,734 bytes)
6. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:53:29 -0700; Are you running a disk cache that you know of? Sounds like SMARTDRV might fix this. TR does use disk overlays and if they actually do come off the disk - it can slow things down. Different versions; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00009.html (7,750 bytes)
7. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Kirley <pkirley@fuse.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:23:17 -0400; I'm using pure DOS 6.22 (no Windows available on my logging machine), but was not using SMARTDRV for TRLog--although I had menus set up in CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT that used SMARTDRV in other situ; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00010.html (9,170 bytes)
8. Re: [Trlog] Version 6.88 Slowdown Question (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:43:24 -0700; Excellent. I have been using SMARTDRV for many years without an issue. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-08/msg00011.html (7,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]