Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Which\s+version\s+do\s+I\s+use\s+for\s+CW\s+SS\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] Which version do I use for CW SS? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Bailey" <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:19:01 -0500
Hi All: I'd like to try the SO2R enhancements in newer versions of TR-Log. After reading Tree's (retracted) advice to use an old, known, version, I had decided to use 6.72 again. Did anyone use 6.78
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-10/msg00113.html (7,042 bytes)

2. RE: [Trlog] Which version do I use for CW SS? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Wetzel" <mjwetzel@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:51:22 -0500
Mark, I used the latest version with 2 IC-781's and had pretty good success (no major problems), just a few minor glitches that I will mention to Tree. I did end up rebooting about 10 times (again no
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-10/msg00114.html (8,173 bytes)

3. Re: [Trlog] Which version do I use for CW SS? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:09:17 -0000
Well, I kind-of-like 6.69...It worked flawlessly in CW SS last year for me with my TS-930S/PIEXX and TS-950SDX running SO2R. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ Trlog mail
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-10/msg00115.html (7,825 bytes)

4. Re: [Trlog] Which version do I use for CW SS? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:33:31 -0500
At 03:09 AM 10/28/03 +0000, Steve London wrote: Well, I kind-of-like 6.69...It worked flawlessly in CW SS last year for me with my TS-930S/PIEXX and TS-950SDX running SO2R. Well, FWIW, I loaded 6.76
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-10/msg00117.html (8,093 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu