Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[FFMA\]\s+MAST\s+FOR\s+ROVERS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[FFMA\]\s+MAST\s+FOR\s+ROVERS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [FFMA] MAST FOR ROVERS (score: 1): Author: "Jim Johnson" <jim@kc4hw.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:19:48 -0500; I don't think the following would represent the best solution, but I too have been thinking about this and thought that I would try to use some of the 1m fiberglass military poles. My thought was to; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-08/msg00014.html (8,304 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [FFMA] MAST FOR ROVERS (score: 1): Author: jimk8mr--- via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 23:06:32 +0000 (UTC); I'm not sure how well it would hold beams at sufficient heights, but for HF roving I use a 33 ft fiberglass mast held up with a tripod of two four foot surplus aluminum mast sections for legs, with a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-08/msg00015.html (10,371 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [FFMA] MAST FOR ROVERS (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:10:06 -0700; Unless there is a specific need for a Fiberglass pole I would be inclined to use the 4 foot aluminium military surplus poles vs the 4 foot surplus Fiberglass poles (I believe both were originally use; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-08/msg00016.html (11,212 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] [FFMA] MAST FOR ROVERS (score: 1): Author: "Terry Price" <terry@directivesystems.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 21:38:40 -0400; I am very lucky to have a 40' and a 55' pneumatic mast on my 1994 Dodge van for roving. Using compressed air or a nitrogen tank to raise the antenna stack is VERY nice, fast and effort less! However,; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-08/msg00018.html (10,521 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]