Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+160m\s+VHF\s+SS\s+Warmup\s+Strategy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+160m\s+VHF\s+SS\s+Warmup\s+Strategy\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] 160m VHF SS Warmup Strategy (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:09:26 -0600 (CST); I think CW is a must for VHF+ weak-signal work. Many times I have not been able to make it through with SSB but did with CW. Listen for my weak CW signal if you're working SSB - and you can even answ; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00121.html (8,683 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] 160m VHF SS Warmup Strategy (score: 1): Author: Vince Adams <vinoul@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:11:12 +0000; I plan on participating using the "indoor dorm room loop special" :-) Had a bunch of fun with it in the ARRL 160m contest. I mainly consider myself a VHF contester but realized early on that I needed; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00122.html (9,804 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] 160m VHF SS Warmup Strategy (score: 1): Author: Paul N1BUG <paul_n1bug@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:39:38 -0500; I totally agree about CW being a must for VHF+ weak signal work - and contesting. I have made many a VHF+ contact using CW that would not have been possible otherwise. I would like to add one thing I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00124.html (9,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]