Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+FT8\s+and\s+the\s+ARRL\s+June\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+\-\s+Reformatted\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+FT8\s+and\s+the\s+ARRL\s+June\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+\-\s+Reformatted\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] FT8 and the ARRL June VHF Contest - Reformatted! (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:18:25 -0600; As many of you know, I had been forecasting the "death" of SSB on 6M due to FT8 for some time. It has certainly come true on day-to-day openings. While I understand the attractiveness of the mode for; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00127.html (20,541 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] FT8 and the ARRL June VHF Contest - Reformatted! (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:52:18 -0400; We have to consider the casual contester. The op at home, with a loop 15 feet off the ground, and poor terrain. There are a lot of people with this type of station out there. They don't care that the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00128.html (25,875 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]