Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+New\s+Rules\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+New\s+Rules\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] New Rules.... (score: 1): Author: David All <n3xudfm19@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:17:25 -0500; I agree, for our National Sanctioning Body to have gone away from one of the time honored traditions in the QSL cards with LOTW was one thing. But to amend the criteria for an award with anything les; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-03/msg00000.html (10,753 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] New Rules.... (score: 1): Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 14:58:27 +0000 (UTC); Then no one bothers or cares to earn a particular award, and likely another award body following their own rules will be created which people will use. -- Original Message -- From: David All <n3xudfm; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-03/msg00007.html (11,046 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]