Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+2m\s+FT\-8\s+Problem\s+Solved\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+2m\s+FT\-8\s+Problem\s+Solved\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 2m FT-8 Problem Solved (score: 1): Author: "Steve$K1IIG$" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:38:19 -0400; I agree .174 is not a great choice being so close to .175. At least do a splinter freq of .172.5 keeping the adjacent channel interference to a minimum. If finding a clean frequency on 2m is such a s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-07/msg00033.html (14,347 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]