Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+432\s+collinear\s+array\s+setup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+432\s+collinear\s+array\s+setup\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 432 collinear array setup (score: 1): Author: David Vondrasek <n5ito@davidv.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:20:19 -0500; At the moment I am building a array of DX-420 collinear antennas. I have 4 each of the DX-420s (20 ele) Giving me 80 elements. At present I have an frame that stacks them as such.. ____ ____ __|__ __; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00086.html (7,673 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 432 collinear array setup (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:33:15 -0500; The second layout would give you a slightly narrower, taller pattern than the first. I remember a local using 160 elements on 144 for his EME array. It covered a lot of real estate but worked very we; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00089.html (9,878 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 432 collinear array setup (score: 1): Author: "jeff millar" <wa1hco@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:38:08 -0400; Dave... Definitely stack them vertically. If you go horizontal, the beam width gets too narrow and you miss stations. The H frame consists of one (or two) horizontal member(s) with two vertical membe; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00090.html (10,706 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]