Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+5\s+Band\s+VUCC\s+Award\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+5\s+Band\s+VUCC\s+Award\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:23:11 -0500; Several amateurs have written to tell me that they are reaching out to their ARRL Division Directors and endorsing the idea of a Five Band VHF-UHF Century Club Award. My hope is that VHF Associations; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00121.html (11,763 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:36:27 -0400; I was with you right up to the "reset to zero" part. I have 90 something grids on 2m, and if I had to restart at zero for this, well, that's not happening here. 73, Drew KO4MA Sent from my iPhone ___; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00122.html (12,569 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:49:55 -0500; Drew, Ha, Ha.I hear you. I have 104 grids worked on 2 Meters, with about 83 confirmed. Working hard to confirm the rest, and thinking that it may require setting up a portable digital EME operation f; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00123.html (12,866 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:05:32 -0500; Ignoring the "programming requirements" for LOTW (which is in need of a ground-up re-write, but never mind that) ... this is where a lot of the 6-and-up crowd fall down. I've got nearly 200 grids wor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00124.html (8,034 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:15 -0500; KE4YZN K8DXR AA7A K7MY These ops were kind enough to upload to LOTW but don't have their grid entered in their Station Location within TQSL. If any of you know them, please let them know of the overs; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00125.html (7,835 bytes)
6. [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:50:25 -0500; Lady & Gentlemen, In an effort to stimulate activity on VHF/UHF bands beyond 70 CM, Id like to suggest the creation of a Five Band VUCC (5B VUCC) award that would closely mirror the 5 Band DXCC Award; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00059.html (7,690 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Alan Larson <wa6azp@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:55:08 -0700; Les and folks, some thoughts on the 5BVUCC idea: It seems a worthwhile award for folks to go for, it would provide a further step for folks who have already gotten VUCC. The extra bands would remain; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00070.html (9,632 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 18:03:48 -0500; Greg, Always good to hear from you, my friend. Been too long since weve had an eyeball QSO. Reading the mail on this proposal, its clear that there is also considerable interest and support for a VUC; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00086.html (12,859 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5 Band VUCC Award (score: 1): Author: Chris Lumens <chris@lumensoutdoors.org>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:19:33 -0400; I think a 5B VUCC award is a fun idea, and I also like making satellites (or at least, sats that actually use VHF/UHF bands - there's a 10m/15m sat in the works) one of the bands. I could go either; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00098.html (12,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]