Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+6\s+meter\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+6\s+meter\s+antenna\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 6 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: tom@k4nr.org (Tom Branch); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003; Greetings, I'm adding a 6 meter antenna to my farm to play around on 6. I have two options: 60 feet in the air on my tower with 200 feet of coax, or at 25 feet with 40 feet of coax. The tower mount i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01124.html (6,962 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] 6 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: tom@k4nr.org (Tom Branch); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003; Paul, The lower height is below the tops of the trees. While this is not a problem for HF, I'm not sure about VHF. The coax run is Belden 89880--loss of 1.15 dB per 100 feet at 50 MHz. Total loss wit; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01125.html (7,234 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] 6 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: k1dh1@hotmail.com (Donald Huntington); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003; I'd go with the higher antenna for long haul tropo and a lower antenna for sporadic E and meteor scatter. I am assuming you don't live on a hill or mountain...hi hi. What ever you decide will work an; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01126.html (8,211 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] 6 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003; Hi Tom, Either position has advantages as far as I can see. At my QTH I have the luxury of choosing 50 MHz antennas at 90, 66, 42, and 18 ft, plus I have a small 5 element yagi at 30 ft with a differ; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01128.html (8,299 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] 6 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: "Christopher S Peightal" <peightalhead@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:35:45 -0600; Quick question. I would like to get some feedback on the M2 6M7 or 6M7JHV. I was thinking about upgrading from the M2 6M5X. What kind of results do the users out there get from the 6M7. I seen some g; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00016.html (6,727 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: Bob Cumming <w2bzy@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:13:46 -0500; Chris I've had a 6M7JHV up here in Central Florida for over 9 years with no problems! The reason I chose the 6M7JHV over the 6M7 is weight. Initially I had it on a Rohn 25 tower with a Hazer atop a 1; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00017.html (8,614 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6 meter antenna (score: 1): Author: wa4kxy@bellsouth.net; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:25:42 +0000; I have had a 6M7 up for several years. No problems and it works great. Quick question. I would like to get some feedback on the M2 6M7 or 6M7JHV. I was thinking about upgrading from the M2 6M5X. What; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00018.html (7,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]