Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+70cm\s+power\s+limits\s+near\s+Otis\s+AFB\s+$cape\s+cod\,\s+MA$\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+70cm\s+power\s+limits\s+near\s+Otis\s+AFB\s+$cape\s+cod\,\s+MA$\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 70cm power limits near Otis AFB (cape cod, MA)? (score: 1): Author: "Carrington, Walter" <Walter.Carrington@umassmed.edu>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:19:46 -0400; If I'm reading FCC regulations right, there is a 50W power limit on 420 - 450 mhz within 100 miles of Otis AFP. Am I reading something outdated? This would include most of Eastern and Central Mass. a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00080.html (6,885 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 70cm power limits near Otis AFB (cape cod, MA)? (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:32:47 -0400; You're not wrong; you're reading the rules correctly. The power restrictions are to protect the Pave Paws radar at Otis; 70 cm is a shared band, the amateur service is secondary to federal radiolocat; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00081.html (7,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]