Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+903\s+vs\s+1296\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+903\s+vs\s+1296\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 903 vs 1296 (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:19:29 EST; I'm considering adding another band to my 6 - 2 -222 - 432 station. 903 and 1296 are the obvious choices, with the DEM 28 MHz IF transverters being the prime candidate for equipment. (I am already us; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00083.html (6,968 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 903 vs 1296 (score: 1): Author: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:09:23 -0500; Jimk8mr@aol.com <Jimk8mr@aol.com> wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2004 at 11:19:29 -0500 in <8e.66eab57.2d906c11@aol.com>: In my experience, 903 MHz is much more likely to be crowded with cordless telephones an; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00085.html (7,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]