Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+quasi\-history\s+of\s+roving\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+quasi\-history\s+of\s+roving\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:25:56 -0700 (PDT); Dates are almost surely not correct. 1983 - ARRL adopts Maidenhead system and creates grid locators and VUCC. It's a hit. 1983 - 1985 Guys go out during contests and work other guys from adjacent gri; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00157.html (8,613 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:33:56 -0700 (PDT); The only change I want is a return to the original rover rules. CQ Magazine uses those rules for the CQVHF contest, and I think the spring and fall sprints use the original rover rules also. 73s John; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00158.html (7,465 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:36:46 -0400; I don't want to get into the middle of this but since the Fall Sprints have been mentioned I have one comment/question. Yes, we use the original rover rules in the fall sprint. One problem though. We; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00169.html (9,407 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: K3uhf@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:05:55 EDT; As a rover who made a decision not to rove in the sprints I will tell you the sprints are too short to rove unless you live or are willing and able to get to a corner to start near. For me I could hi; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00171.html (8,231 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:03:43 -0400; DEMI already sponsors a participation award for 222 and microwaves. I haven't actively approached anyone but if someone wants to do something similar for 6, 2 and/or 432 we would be open to that. 73; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00172.html (10,157 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: "Eric Smith" <kb7dqh@donobi.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:10:10 -0700; Short answer- time...not enough of it. Long answer- I have rovered the various sprints- takes a bit of prior planning. I have also operated from home, and done portable operations near home. Roving--; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00173.html (9,998 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1): Author: "David Erickson" <erickson+vhf@mddsg.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:15:11 -0400 (EDT); Jim, The biggest problem we have for rover operations is that it usually takes us 1-2 days to prep the vehicle for roving. It's alot of work for setup and tear down for just a few hours of operations; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00181.html (11,327 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]