Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+Limiting\s+MultiOps\s+\[was\:\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+Limiting\s+MultiOps\s+\[was\:\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: "Hoffman, Mark" <mhoffman@microwavedata.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:33:23 -0500; The same argument can be made about becoming a competitive HF contest station. It's expensive, it takes a lot of time and effort to build a station, and a lot of time and effort to learn how to use; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00087.html (12,156 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:59:07 -0600; Just for the record I would like to point out a few things... Yes - it has been done. Yes it has been done several times. Yes - it has been done - in fact one year the winner for ARRL DX M/2 was form; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00088.html (9,829 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:02:44 -0600; In HF contests, there far more opportunities for less capable stations to feel like they are playing for something. There are HP, LP, and QRP categories. There are single-band categories. Some contes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00094.html (14,097 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]