Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+AM\-6154\s+amp\s+\-\s+thoughts\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+AM\-6154\s+amp\s+\-\s+thoughts\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] AM-6154 amp - thoughts? (score: 1): Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:22:04 -0700 (PDT); I have an opportunity to purchase a ready-to-go AM-6154 (or 6155?) amp for 2m. I have read up on them a little bit and everything I have found has said they are quite robust amps. The owner/operator; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-11/msg00002.html (7,220 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] AM-6154 amp - thoughts? (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 05:56:10 -0600; I have used modified AM-6155 amps on 222 MHz at a couple of different stations, and they are great and can definitely put out 400W on VHF. Two things I'd note: a) the fan noise is quite loud. Headpho; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-11/msg00003.html (8,502 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] AM-6154 amp - thoughts? (score: 1): Author: "Chet S" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:59:34 -0500; These are wonderful amps- high quality design and construction. I have three of them, one waiting to be converted for 222 and the others in use on 2M and 70 cm. But they are HEAVY and the blower whin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-11/msg00004.html (9,105 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] AM-6154 amp - thoughts? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Olean" <k1whs@metrocast.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:10:10 -0500; If anyone is interested I have three AM6154/ AM6155 that I want to sell. They are all converted (by me). Two are on 144, while the third one is on 222 MHz. They all have good tubes. In fact one of th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-11/msg00005.html (10,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]