Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+APRS\s+and\s+Contesting\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: <w0eea@sbbco.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:18:38 -0600
2.1.3 (as well as 2.1) is part of the rules for a Single Operator Station. It has no effect on Rovers or Multi-operator Stations. So Multi-ops can use spotting networks as long as they don't spot th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00110.html (9,111 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:07:42 -0500
I fail to see how transmitting your call and latitude and longitude data is self spotting.. You are not transmitting your rx/tx frequency.. or any qso information... ect... the only thing you are tra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00111.html (10,340 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: j999w@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:06:51 -0400
<Yes, but self spotting (which is what APRS would be) is illegal in most contests, even in the assisted category.> BINGO. "HERE I AM ... WORK ME - WORK ME!" Put out a decent signal, be a good operato
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00114.html (8,521 bytes)

24. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
So, you want full-blown APRS in contests? You got it! Just look beyond the ARRL's events! The Fall Sprints are right around the corner, and there is NO prohibition against using APRS. Ev, W2EV ______
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00116.html (8,300 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:32:25 -0600
"CQ Contest, CQ Contest, Whisky Yankey Zero X-Ray, Rover - Delta November Seven Zero, Contest. Oh no, I just gave my grid square, and self-spotted and disqualified myself. I'm going home guys... have
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00117.html (11,147 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:52:39 -0000
Putting out a call by using an entirely RF path is not self spotting. Putting out an APRS signal into the computer software, with the intent of doing so, is self spotting, because you are making sure
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00119.html (12,627 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Tad Danley <tdanley@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:13 -0500
Hi John, As I understand it that is the way HamIM works and why the ARRL Contest Desk approved it. Rovers send their GPS info out on 147.585 MHz simplex, and there is no digipeating or feed to the in
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00120.html (8,722 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:32:57 -0600
So a multi-op can spot me, and put me on a non-RF system, but I can't put myself there. That's my contention. What's the difference in the end-result? -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com __________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00122.html (9,127 bytes)

29. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@lcisp.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:50:41 -0000
Don't ask me, I didn't make the rules prohibiting self spotting. 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00123.html (9,807 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
-- Original Message -- So a multi-op can spot me, and put me on a non-RF system, but I can't put myself there. That's my contention. What's the difference in the end-result? -- Here's the problem: th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00124.html (8,876 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 07:09:06 -0700
Yeah - it's all pretty crazy, isn't it? That's why we should outlaw the use of all spotting systems in contests. -- Kenneth E. Harker WM5R kenharker@kenharker.com http://www.kenharker.com/ __________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00125.html (8,873 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu