Hi Steve and all. Good discussion. As you may know, I am both an active rover and the Dakota VUAC representative so I watch this discussion from both perspectives. While HamIM is allowed per the curr
I believe the discussions so far would prohibit relayed APRS .. the fixed station would have to directly receive the rover's APRS packets .. I don't have a problem with it, but without widespread ado
Agreed. I've taken APRS along on one rove, and dropped it the next year, because as I asked around the locals "anyone see me on there last weekend?" the answers were all "I never even looked", or "I
-- Original Message -- I don't have a problem with it, but without widespread adoption it's not something that's going to the top of my todo list for the Jitney. SDR, reflocking, networking, etc are