Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ARRL\s+June\s+VHF\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Tobias <wb9woz@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:50:12 -0500
Could someone set me straight here. The Single Operator Portable catagory must be qrp (< 5 watts) right? I can't seem to find the power out requirement in the rules anywhere. Anyway, I'll be operatin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00047.html (6,615 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 23:21:23 -0400
Bruce, From the ARRL General Rules for ARRL Contests on Bands Above 50 MHz http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-vhf.html 2.2.Single Operator Portable: 2.2.1. Ten (10) W PEP output or less
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00048.html (8,052 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 23:01:30 -0500 (CDT)
No, the power limit is 10 watts. Many "true QRPer's" contest this, but it is what the ARRL rules state. I hope to work you! 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00050.html (7,664 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Alex <extraham@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 07:34:54 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I guess that's why the ARRL doesn't call it QRP. It would be inconsistent with HF rules where they do consider QRP to be a maximum of 5 Watts. Why is there no QRP category, anyway? What's wrong with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00051.html (7,849 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Tobias <wb9woz@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:58:01 -0500
Yes, I will be at Greene Valley in Du Page county, IL Elevation of 980 ft (not high for some of you, but the highest elevation in the state is 1012 ft. and 980 is 240 ft higher then my home qth) Grid
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00056.html (8,266 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:43:18 -0500
Actually Charles Mounds at 1235 feet ASL is the highest point in Illinois, but doubt if it is available. Joe W4AAB -- Original Message -- From: "Bruce Tobias" <wb9woz@comcast.net> To: <vhfcontesting@
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00057.html (9,262 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Tobias <wb9woz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:57:06 -0500
Well, what a great contest. Worked 8 hours total over the 2 days. Results from EN51 were: 6 meters 77 qso 100 watts 2 meters 27 qso 50 watts 70 cm 17 qso 20 watts 50 multipliers 6900 claimed score Ra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00095.html (8,639 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Dave NT9E <nt9e@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:11:41 -0500
ARRL June VHF QSO Party Call: NT9E Operator(s): NT9E Station: NT9E Class: Single Op LP QTH: EN52vi Operating Time (hrs): Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 6: 164 85 2: 29 9 222: 432: 15 6 903: 1.2: 2.3: 3.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00071.html (6,903 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu