Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ARRL\s+Proposal\s+for\s+a\s+combined\s+10\s+Meter\s+\&\s+6\s+Meter\s+Contest\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:47:02 -0500
A few weeks ago, Steve N2CEI posted an update from ARRL HQ that authorized the appointment of an-hoc committee related to VHF contesting. Within that posting, he mentioned a desire from ARRL HQ staff
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00007.html (13,158 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Vhfrover via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:41:25 -0400
I would be in favor of a combined 6 and 10M contest as long as it would NOT diminish the existing annual December ARRL 10M contest in any way. The existing 10M contest is very popular and I have enjo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00008.html (9,971 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Rhinosix via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:55:58 -0400
I would support a 10 and 6 meter contest using grids. Also a VUCC type award for 10 meters. Anything that will increase activity on these bands as we look into the back side of this solar cycle. Any
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00010.html (14,243 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:15:44 -0500
I imagine the scoring would be like the other VHF contests - the exchange would be grid squares and the mults would be grid squares, unlike the 10 Meter Contest where the mults are states/provinces/D
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00011.html (11,729 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Evans" <dan.evans@insightbb.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:04:14 -0400
I agree with most everyone else, a 10 & 6 meter contest would be fun! Given a few points such as: 1. A new contest, don't take away from any of the existing contests VHF or HF... 2. Use VHF contest g
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00021.html (12,513 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:10:09 -0700
I would tread lightly on this idea, and stop to really think through the likely operator participation behaviors that it would induce. It strikes me as something that could have the undesired side ef
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00023.html (13,654 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Proposal for a combined 10 Meter & 6 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Thomas <wa4zko@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:24:30 -0400
I personally think adding a HF band to a VHF Contest is a bad idea. If I wanted to work a HF contest, then there are plenty (arguably too many) of them already available. Nothing against those that e
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00029.html (10,438 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu