Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Beaconet\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Beaconet\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet (score: 1): Author: ihi@frontiernet.net (John Isenberg); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003; Ev, I am not sure how your configuration prevents two signals on a band at one time. I have done this in hardware by building a transistor/relay control box for sequencing the mic PTT and the CW keye; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01809.html (7,248 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet (score: 1): Author: w2fca@cs.com (w2fca@cs.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003; "As with most TNC's it will "hold off" transmitting if it believes that the frequency is in use. Due to the close proximity of antennas in a Rover, it is quite likely that operation in the narrowband; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01810.html (7,711 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003; Hmm - maybe in a rover... but as I understand it, this technology is now allowed for home stations where this method of preventing more than one signal at a time would not be sufficient. It would see; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01811.html (8,227 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet (score: 1): Author: w2fca@cs.com (w2fca@cs.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003; Why wouldn't the PTT interlock method that is mentioned work? Frank W2FCA; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01812.html (7,217 bytes)
5. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003; Sorry - didn't meant to imply it wouldn't. Just that it would be required as opposed to any automatic method. Also, I would think that many stations would slap this together just in time for a contes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01813.html (7,170 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]