Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Bird\/CD\s+element\s+question\s+re\s+432\s+mhz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Bird\/CD\s+element\s+question\s+re\s+432\s+mhz\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Bird/CD element question re 432 mhz (score: 1): Author: Donald Fox via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:52:18 -0700; Gents: Trying to decide whether to pick up a D or E series element to go with my 43 for my 432 station. I recently added an aftermarket PEP board, and will have between 150-200 watts out of a TE 4452; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00182.html (7,470 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Bird/CD element question re 432 mhz (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:05:58 -0400; My experience is that you will have considerable loss of accuracy at 23 cm, with an E element. Really the Bird slugs for 23 cm are not that accurate. They tend to read low. Above a E slug, in frequen; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00183.html (9,154 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Bird/CD element question re 432 mhz (score: 1): Author: VE3DS <ve3ds@acanac.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 22:12:27 -0400; Donald The Bird is accurate to 5% of full scale, so if you are running 200 watts on 432 then go with an element that will give you best repeatability of readings. 400- 1000 like a 250E or 500E if you; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00184.html (8,758 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]