It is not a new policy. If you send in a log, it is assumed to be your complete log. If you work 10G and 24G in addition to the lower 4 bands but only send in a log for the lower 4, then you have not
I've only been following the thread casually so perhaps I've missed something along the way. I'm not sure, at least for me, that when I submit a "contest log" it necessarily means my complete log.
"Well, that screws me!" Why? "I was all set to go Ltd. with 10 GHz (20w) and 24 Ghz (2W), and 144/223 as liaisons, for my 4 bands, but that's apparently not possible now." You can still enter as a Cl
The problem isn't with folks that don't send in any log. The problem is with folks who send in a log but don't include all the bands they work. No naming any names, there was a limited multiop who no
The ARRL has been cross checking logs for the VHF contests for two or three years now. Terry is correct, if you are operating in a limited category for example and you give somone a contact on a micr
I'd like to reinforce this. Last summer I worked a multi-op station a total of eight times from different grid squares. Three QSOs on 6M and the other five on 2,222,and 432. Only the 6M QSOs were in
And, to make matters worse, ask someone at the ARRL how to submit your 4 low bands as your log but assign other contacts as checkllogs. I can't find it in the Cabrillo header - you can't submit a sep
Terry - It's always been the policy that you can submit a log and declare your class that is a subset of that log. In ARRL DX if I start the contest on the low bands, but Saturday morning decide that
I posted a note to the VHF Contesting reflector last year, explaining how to submit a Rover log to the Robot and get in the correct category. You can find it in the VHF contesting archives here: http
Thanks Sean for the link. Does this same thing apply to a limited multi op? Terry -- Original Message -- To: VHF Contesting Reflector Sent: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [VHFcont
Serious question: How does one do this in Cabrillo format? I don't believe there's a way to tag specific bands as "these are the ones we want to use for our score" vs. "these are check logs on these