Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Coax\s+Switch\s+vs\.\s+Duplexer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Coax\s+Switch\s+vs\.\s+Duplexer\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Coax Switch vs. Duplexer (score: 1): Author: Jarred Jackson <Jarred.Jackson@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 22:59:51 +0000; I have an IC-7000 with a common VHF/UHF output and switch between 2m and 70cm amplifiers/antennas using a Diamond CX-210A coax switch. I am thinking of replacing the switch with a Comet CF-4160 duple; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00014.html (8,047 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Coax Switch vs. Duplexer (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 16:14:35 -0700; I've used a Comet CF 4160 for a similar purpose with an Icom 706 MkiiG. I didn't experience any issues. (The only caveat I'll mention is that I almost exclusively use double shielded patch cords in m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00015.html (8,910 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Coax Switch vs. Duplexer (score: 1): Author: Floyd Rodgers <kc5qbc@swbell.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 18:52:02 -0500; For field day I run an ft857 using a diamond mx72 duplexer to split vhf/uhf to single band amps and recombine the signal with another mx72 which goes to a dual band beam. At home similar ft847 to sin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00016.html (7,640 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Coax Switch vs. Duplexer (score: 1): Author: John Young via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 22:28:40 -0400; The below relates to FM Simplex frequencies. If this is just for casual conversation use the diplexer it makes life very easy. If this is a weak signal contest set up go with the switch. After the Ja; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00017.html (9,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]