Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Constructive\s+suggestions\s+for\s+VHF\/UHF\s+Contest\s+rules\s+changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Constructive\s+suggestions\s+for\s+VHF\/UHF\s+Contest\s+rules\s+changes\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Constructive suggestions for VHF/UHF Contest rules changes (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:24:32 -0600; If we are unhappy about the results of the recent rover rules change, it is time we turned this thread toward constructive suggestions for contest rules change. Here is one option I suggest after thi; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00428.html (10,614 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Constructive suggestions for VHF/UHF Contest rules changes (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:53:52 EDT; These are my thoughts. They have focused on increasing activity, not leveling the playing field. Others? - Duffey As gagging as most of this discussion has been, I will use this opening to mention on; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00430.html (8,970 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Constructive suggestions for VHF/UHF Contest rules changes (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:00:34 -0700 (PDT); Bookmark this e-mail. It contains t-h-e solution. Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00444.html (13,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]