I would like to ask the group a question. Why does the success of a contest need to be measured by the number of logs received by the ARRL? Instead of dropping a contest because of the reluctance to
Ron, I have to disagree on this. In my experience participation in my area of the south is much less than it was in the mid 90's. At least on 2 meters this is so. For example, I did not work anyone i
David, I usually never work the same stations that I worked back in the 70s 80s or 90s. Personal interest change and even you may be found chasing DX on 160 in a couple of years instead of operating
It seems that would be a fairly easy thing to identify with modern computer logs. The ARRL could compile a list of all stations logged in the logs they DO get, and then see what percentage of those s
the Hi Ken, Our director for the SE Division is Frank Butler, W4RH. He voted against the removal of the line scores. Frank has been the director since 1980 and been basically unopposed in the electi
It seems that would be a fairly easy thing to identify with modern computer logs. The ARRL could compile a list of all stations logged in the logs they DO get, and then see what percentage of those s
I think Ron brought some good points that I would like to address. I am speaking only for myself and not my rover partner. Last September was my second time out as a rover. The first trip was a last