Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+DN02\,\s+100W\s+6m\s+useful\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+DN02\,\s+100W\s+6m\s+useful\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] DN02, 100W 6m useful? (score: 1): Author: Richard Hill <REHill@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:27:18 -0700; Tom, thanks. A typo. I do mean DN02, southeast Oregon. Is it an advantage to be at lower elevation? I'm very open to suggestions as you know my experience is limited. I just assumed higher is better; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00046.html (17,245 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] DN02, 100W 6m useful? (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:41:06 -0700 (PDT); Hi Rich, If you get to the top of Steens Mountain, you will be able to work stations at long distances in every direction. There are many stations in this area active and able to reach DN02. I recomm; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00047.html (16,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]