Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Digital\s+and\s+Q\s+arrangement\s+contesting\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: Dennis Allen <N9TZL@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:27:25 +0000
I had written this a while back but had not posted it yet but its time, should have sent it before! At this point I do not do any digital mode contesting and I would think there are others in the sam
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00087.html (7,511 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: Lew Sayre <w7ew@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:40:41 -0700
Greetings to all Contesters, K5QE has written up a fine article about VHF contesting and why we should leave the contest rules alone. It is clear that K5QE cares deeply about the subject. So do I. I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00101.html (10,742 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:53:45 -0600
... for what it's worth, Lew has nailed down my exact feelings and opinion of the current state of VHF contesting in this new world of FT8. I approve of his post ! -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG ___
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00105.html (12,341 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: Marshall-K5QE <k5qe@k5qe.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:10:31 +0000
Hi Lew....thanks for your comments.  I have written about this topic several years ago, before the ARRL changed its VHF contesting rules.  Those "white papers" are found at http://k5qe.com/1stpost.ht
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00109.html (14,471 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:21:20 -0600
Lew, Problem is it is very difficult to turn back the clock. If you separate out digital that means no JT65 EME and no MSK144 meteor scatter. Maybe it is a regional thing based on population density.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00111.html (13,966 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: Kim <whensley11@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:13:37 -0500 (CDT)
I'm going to chime in here on the heels of John's email. We participate in the same contest group. The comments I see here to some degree reflect where you are and what is around you. Not all of us s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00114.html (11,380 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Hewlett via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
Lew W7EW - Excellent post! It is what I was trying to get across in my post but you did a better job.  Steve N4NIV ... for what it's worth, Lew has nailed down my exact feelings and opinion of the cu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00117.html (14,587 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu