Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FLEX\-1500\s+SDR\s+Platform\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: Mike Benonis <mailinglists@benonis.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:27:51 -0500
Folks, I was looking at the FLEX-100 SDR today as a potential IF rig for a VHF/UHF contest station (potentially for field or rover use as well). Has anyone bought and used one of these rigs? I'm part
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00022.html (6,975 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: Sebastian <w4as@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:36:01 -0500
I owned one very briefly, and returned it immediately. I couldn't get over the lack of VOX. 73 de Sebastian, W4AS _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00024.html (7,896 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:46:58 -0600
I was looking at the FLEX-100 SDR today as a potential IF rig for a VHF/UHF contest station (potentially for field or rover use as well). Has anyone bought and used one of these rigs?  I'm particular
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00025.html (8,730 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: David Feldman <wb0gaz@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:49:11 -0800 (PST)
CW transmit using internal (iambic) or external (key/keyer) has timing problems awaiting a software release I've been told is due in December (2010). If CW transmit is important to you, I'd check car
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00027.html (7,970 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: David McKenzie <k1fsy@vhfwiki.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:48:03 -0500
The newest beta (2.0.16) supposedly fixes (or at least significantly improves) CW performance from what I've seen on the Flex lists. I don't operate CW so I have no first-hand experience with it othe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00028.html (9,683 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: David McKenzie <k1fsy@vhfwiki.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:50:42 -0500
Also important to note is that FMN operation with any of the Flex radios is severely crippled and that it won't be fixed until version 2.1 of the software (2.0 has been beta for almost a year and sti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00029.html (10,418 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: David Feldman <wb0gaz@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 08:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Unfortunately, at least in my case (I am almost 100% cw op, have a 1500 now, ordered early adopter, shipped early adopter, and is now running 2.0.16 on a dedicated machine) there are CW transmit prob
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00031.html (10,387 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FLEX-1500 SDR Platform (score: 1)
Author: Stu2 <stu@stu2.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:01:58 -0500
We (W4IY) used the Flex 1500 and 5000A for the ARRL VHF/UHF contests on 432 and 222 with Elecraft transverters, solid state amps and mast mounted preamps. The biggest challenge was converting to a ra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-11/msg00032.html (9,022 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu