Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FM\s+Activity\s+\-\s+More\,\s+Less\,\s+No\s+Change\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FM\s+Activity\s+\-\s+More\,\s+Less\,\s+No\s+Change\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:06:37 -0600; With the new FM Only category, did activity on the FM channels see any difference in your areas? 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00045.html (7,262 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: Mike Fahmie <wa6zty@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:28:09 -0800 (PST); I don't believe that it changed in Northern California. My QTH was on a 4200' hilltop overlooking the Central Valley. My FM antenna was a vertical to match the FM convention here. It may take a few m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00046.html (8,213 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: "Chet S" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:00:35 -0500; I haven't developed any capability to go to the FM portions during the contest, so don't go there, and cannot comment about that. When asking stations if they had any other bands for a contact, there; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00047.html (8,486 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: David All <n3xudfm19@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:02:38 -0500; Arrl needs to run big article on it prior to june contest Dave n3xud/r. Fm19 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00048.html (9,292 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Tripp $K1IIG$" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:24:19 -0500; I made one contact on 222.500 FM but did not pursue other bands. I am not sure FM will be a big homerun and think most are headed for digital. 73's Steve Arrl needs to run big article on it prior to; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00049.html (9,716 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: "Bob K0NR (list)" <list@k0nr.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:48:55 -0700; I did not notice any change in the level of FM operating during the contest (in Colorado). 73, Bob K0NR 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcon; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00063.html (8,240 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: Tim Coad <timcoad@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:36:55 -0800; Yes and no... Here in the SF Bay Area I noticed an increase in FM activity but most of it was by known VHF contesters getting on hoping the FM "crowd" would join in... But maybe there is no FM crowd,; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00066.html (9,381 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity - More, Less, No Change? (score: 1): Author: David Hoad <w4isi@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:07:43 -0500; IN MY AREA YORKTOWN VA AND PRESENT ANTENNAS NO CONTACTS DID NOT WORK 100% OF THE CONTEST DAVE 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@co; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-01/msg00067.html (8,494 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]