Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FN55\s+result\s+and\s+comments\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:54:53 -0400
144 MHz only: 27 QSOs, 17 grids. 1500W, 16 dBi at 110' CW/SSB only That's not bad considering I didn't make a full effort (taking advantage of good weather to work on outside stuff including antennas
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00044.html (7,787 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:10:28 -0400
Hi Paul, How far up/down the band (2 meters) do you tune and/or watch if using a band scope? I usually have the bands cope/panadapter cover from just below .140 to just above .300. This will allow me
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00051.html (7,882 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: "Chet S" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:23:11 -0400
Hi Paul, Here in CT where there is more local activity, the band is not over-crowded, there is always lots of clear space, and it is rare to find anyone below 170 or above 250 so I would not CQ there
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00052.html (9,934 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:29:41 -0500
Paul, I agree with you that I wish stations would wait a minute to listen to other callers before QSYing to work someone on another band. I heard a couple of such QSOs going on, called them but they
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00053.html (11,334 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:02:27 -0300
I feel your pain (and then some) neighbour. It saddens me to say that I've finally (after decades) given up on VHF contests, unless 6m is wide open. My patience finally wore out and many in the Marit
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00058.html (7,555 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 07:59:59 -0400
Well the dust has settled and I am busy building antennas for 222 and 432... The comments from VE9AA underscore the plight of those in grids that are off the beaten path. We want to work you. You wan
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00069.html (9,913 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:08:57 -0400
Paul, Paul, I do my contesting from or EM84 or EM85 and the situation you describe is very similar to ours. And I agree that somebody needs to do Search and Pounce. Think about it, if everyone was in
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00070.html (13,475 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 08:28:27 -0600
seconds at a time'. That's the job of the 'unenlightened' op's who stubbornly refuse to move OFF those modes when the band opens for sporadic E during the summer contests. The September and January
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00071.html (9,499 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 09:41:59 -0600 (MDT)
Well, actually, it hurts more than just the digiter's score. Jonesy -- <pre> Marvin L Jones | W3DHJ | W3DHJ | https://W3DHJ.net/ Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | __ linux FreeBSD 38.238N 104.547W | jo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00072.html (9,018 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 09:42:21 -0700
I ran analog only in the September contest from my Rover / back pack portable station (although I only operated on Saturday.) I don't really have enough data to draw any conclusions about the impact
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00073.html (10,981 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: "Allen Oldfield" <aoldfiel@stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:42:40 -0400
John, Re the 35WPM CW. At least on 2M and above, the contest CW that I've always heard (and worked) is more like 12-15 WPM and sometimes, slower. Me? If I heard a 35 WPM signal, instead of QRZ, you'd
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00074.html (14,560 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:04:50 -0400
John, I am not giving up! No way! In fact I am increasingly taking financial risks to add bands. I'm not yet crazy enough to push it this far if I had any thoughts of giving up. However, some have gi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00075.html (17,649 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu