Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT8\s+and\s+up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT8\s+and\s+up\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT8 and up (score: 1): Author: Herb Krumich via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:05:19 +0000 (UTC); Curious who might have used FT8 on 222 and upEducate meThanks Herb K2LNS _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-01/msg00078.html (6,868 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 and Up (score: 1): Author: Steve Kavanagh via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:50:01 +0000 (UTC); Herb I made one FT8 QSO on 432 upon request from a station around 40-50 km away. Signal was good - it would have been easy copy on CW, maybe on SSB. But FT8 had a hard time copying, though it eventua; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-01/msg00096.html (7,816 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]